Bad juxtapositions

university of denver

The archi­tect meant well. He was seek­ing to com­bine clas­si­cal ele­ments with a mod­ern twist. I would sug­gest that he failed. The gold-and-maroon dome does not sync well with the rest of the build­ing. And where in clas­sic archi­tec­ture do you see a 360-degree clear glass balcony?

It is very pos­si­ble to com­bine clas­sic design with mod­ern style — but that is a dif­fi­cult task. All the more pity when mil­lions of dol­lars have been spent in the exercise.

The beauty of graphic design is that the stakes are usu­ally much lower. One excep­tion would be when a cor­po­ra­tion rolls out a new logo. If they failed, it’s hard to roll back in the red carpet.

Did you like this? Share it:

Comments

  1. Dzinerdeb says:

    It isn’t the dome itself that I mind, it’s the glass that makes it appear to float in the air. As in the design world, you can’t always blame the designer — some­times it’s the client that insists on some­thing goofy.

  2. paulmerrill says:

    VERY good point, Deb. The designer may have had a fan­tas­tic design, and the client had a dif­fer­ent thing in mind.

Speak Your Mind

*